Learner or Lurker?
AS I SEE “IT”
Since chat rooms were new, there have always been people who enter and read all the chats but do not contribute in any
observable or meaningful way. They are called
lurkers.
When you think about the term professional
learning, you might picture inquisitive minds
seeking to explore new boundaries of thinking
and being part of a social community where these
ideas are vetted and tested. But, unfortunately,
that is not typical for school staff meetings, professional development sessions, or data study teams.
I have come to the conclusion that we are now a
generation of professional learners and lurkers.
By Don Hall
As I See “IT” is an editorial opinion column that
appears in every other
issue of L&L. If you are
interested in writing
a guest As I See “IT”
column, please email
kconley@iste.org.
Lurking
As professional lurkers, we sit at the fringe trying to look like we are participating without
adding any real value and hoping we are not
required to exert any real mental energy for
problem solving or creating new knowledge.
This may sound harsh, and it is in a sense.
Because we represent the one institution that
should know how to promote innovative thinking, critical analysis, and continuous professional improvement, we should lead the way in
modeling professional learning.
Instead, too many are like me when I ask my
daughter to show me how to do something on my
iPhone, which she does with such casual ease. I
pay only marginal attention to what she is doing.
I either consider it too complicated, irrelevant, or
not worth my time. When she is done, I can honestly say that I did not learn anything, and she will
have to do it for me again the next time. That is a
clear example of a professional lurker.
We see these behaviors all the time when
teachers attend workshops on how to use technology. When we ask them later why they do
not use it in their classroom, they respond,
“We need better training.” I propose that the
initial training was probably sufficient, but the
mindset they went into it with was not.
It is not all their fault, though. We grew up
in a time when professional learning meant
something very specific and required a narrow
set of skills, usually memorization. Most of us
mastered those skills. Now, however, the sheer
volume of information and rate at which it is
created make those skills of limited value, and
the time we have to develop new learning strategies is even more limited.
Most of today’s working adults are a generation of people who want shortcuts for doing
things. Most do not want to expend the mental
effort to learn something new, let alone create
something new. As technology leaders, we have
gotten better at providing training aids for our
schools in the form of tip sheets, training videos,
and webinars. However, our help desks are still
flooded with questions about how to solve basic
problems, such as what to do when someone’s
computer “locks up” or how to get a computer
screen to show up on a classroom projector.
There is no organizational or personal expectation that these employees will use some critical
thinking skills to try to resolve these issues on
their own.
Learning
So what is the answer? This is not a simple fix
because it requires a change in thinking and
istockphoto.com/DrAfter123