When ISTE began developing educa- tional technology standards for PK– 12 students in the early 1990s, it was ahead
of its time. The organization saw the need to
prepare students for the future, and it invested
in standards as a way to give schools a clear path
to staying relevant. The future that ISTE foresaw
has definitely arrived, but it’s not standing still.
To ensure that the standards remain useful for
students and educators around the world, ISTE
has submitted them to a rigorous updating and
revision process.
Standards are also helpful in research, as they
provide a frame of reference to explain, predict,
and understand phenomena. Imagine that you
have been asked to provide a report on the appropriate use of technology in your classroom. From
your teaching experience, you may be able to
describe a number of things you do that could be
considered appropriate use of technology. However, if you were able to use the ISTE Standards (
formerly the NETS) to guide your thinking, wouldn’t
that task become much easier because you’d have
specific things to look for? Also, the evidence
you gathered would not be based on your experience alone, but on the collective experiences and
knowledge of many educators and experts in the
field who developed the standards.
The ISTE Standards ( iste.org/standards) are
designed to connect with different roles and responsibilities in an educational environment. For
instance, if you wanted to observe the principal
of your school, you would use the ISTE Standards for Administrators (ISTE Standards•A),
and if you wanted to investigate how the stu-
Helen Crompton is an
assistant professor of
instructional technology at Old Dominion
University in Norfolk,
Virginia, USA. As an
ISTE faculty member,
she has worked with
district leaders, principals, technology coaches,
teachers, and parents
across the United States.
Helen Crompton
RESE
AR
C
HW
IN
DO
WS
dents in your class are using technology, the
ISTE Standards for Students (ISTE Standards•S)
would be appropriate. Researchers can use the
ISTE Standards in this same way. The other sets
of standards include the ISTE Standards for
Teachers (ISTE Standards•T), Coaches (ISTE
Standards•C), and Computer Science Educators
(ISTE Standards•CSE).
I searched the literature to get an idea of how
researchers are using the ISTE Standards in
recent years. I collated all of the studies I found
and organized them into groups depending on
which of the ISTE Standards they discussed.
Next, I grouped them depending on the role the
standards played in the context of each study.
(See the table on the next page.)
What initially stood out is that the ISTE
Standards have definitely gone international,
as researchers across the globe are using them.
Researchers in Turkey and China, in particular,
appear to be regular users of the standards, as numerous studies originated in these two countries.
In the collection of research I found, the most
frequently used set of standards was the ISTE
Standards•T, followed by the ISTE Standards•S.
Many of the ISTE Standards•T studies focused
on preparing the future teaching workforce.
Researchers have often found that new teachers
are not adequately prepared to use technology,
so many have turned their attention to thinking
about how preservice teacher courses are aligned
to the ISTE Standards.
For example, Cindy Kovalik, Chia-Ling Kuo,
and Aryn Karpinski from Kent State University
compared an educational technology course to
ISTE Standards in the Research