crutch instead of a learning support. If
AT were part of a comprehensive districtwide system of learning supports,
teachers and parents might see it as an
enabling support rather than a reason
to avoid learning a particular skill.
Resource-oriented instead of case-oriented. Adelman and Taylor believe
that a comprehensive system of learning supports will not be possible if
schools focus only on providing services to students on a case-by-case
basis. This approach results in fragmentation and marginalization.
Instead, they suggest that individual
student supports need to be reframed
as resources that are part of a comprehensive system of learning supports.
This is a bit tricky when it comes to
assistive technology. AT is both legally
and conceptually an individualized
service that requires case-by-case decisions, because each student with a
disability interacts differently with his/
her learning environment. But if AT
were part of a comprehensive system
of learning supports, schools might
view it as part of a systematic effort
to support student learning through
technology rather than as something
that is disconnected from instructional technology initiatives.
For example, Adelman and Taylor
advocate restructuring the work of
student support professionals so that
their expertise is used to develop inte-
grated learning support systems. Per-
haps AT specialists would be included
in a district’s technology leadership
team instead of remaining a margin-
alized support service for individual
students. Perhaps regular education
teachers, not just special educators,
would be empowered to try assistive
technology with their students.
Strive for an IT–AT Partnership
Although they are distinct fields of
practice, assistive technology and instructional technology could both be
considered part of a comprehensive
system of student learning supports.
From my point of view, the assistive
aspect of technology needs to be more
systematically implemented. Perhaps
in partnership, both AT and IT would
enable more students to be creative and
collaborative communicators, researchers, and problem solvers.
Daniel Cochrane, ATP, is
a RESNA-certified assistive
technology specialist for Community Unit School District 200
in Wheaton and Warrenville,
Illinois, and an adjunct AT
instructor at the University of
Gayl Bowser serves as the
volunteer column editor for
As I See AT. Her work focuses
on the integration of technology
into the educational programs
of students with disabilities.
Bowser provides AT consult-
ation, training, and technical assistance in the
United States and abroad.
K- 12 Internet
Resource Center
K12IRC.ORG
Over 2,100 carefully
selected and
annotated links will
provide you with the
tools you need to
create exciting,
topical lesson plans
and curriculum. Like
an Instructional
Resource Center in the real
world, you will find...
a solid foundation for
supporting standards and
assessment practices,
classroom projects, lessons,
units, field trips, extended
studies, and international
databases in almost every
subject and across subjects,
ideas & resources to integrate
media into your curriculum,
tips for school, family, industry,
and community partnerships,
tools for planning and
managing your environment,
professional development and
publishing opportunities.
The K- 12 Instructional Resource
Center is chockfull of the best-of-breed resources for designing,
implementing, and refreshing
lesson plans and curriculum.
Create a great resource?
And now it needs a new home
on the Internet? Check out our
new, free archiving service.
(Check the link below for details.)
Your One-Stop Resource For
Curriculum And Professional
Development.
http://www.k12irc.org/iste
K12IMC.org is a not-for-profit resource,
maintained by Dr. Bonnie Tenenbaum.
Information
and Resources
for the K- 12
community