by modeling, redirecting, reflecting,
and adjusting. And we encourage our
willing teachers to interact with their
students on social media, redirect
them if necessary, and even occasionally call out inappropriate behavior.
Because if we as adults do not help
them recognize and live out appropriate norms, we as a society will reap
the consequences of the inappropriate
norms they learn in our absence. This
approach isn’t cheap, or easy, or automated. But the most valuable parts of
education never are.
—J.D. Ferries-Rowe is the chief information
officer at Brebeuf Jesuit Preparatory School in
Indianapolis, Indiana. He tweets as @jdferries
and blogs about digital citizenship and other
topics at geekreflection.blogspot.com.
our students how to treat each other
respectfully. There will always be con-flict. The question is how to best help
them handle this conflict, particularly
when it happens on a highly visible forum, such as Twitter or Facebook. Instead of spending our time monitoring
and reacting to inappropriate posts, we
need to spend it arming our students
with tools for handling conflict so they
will know when and how to face it if
necessary, how to avoid it when appropriate, and how to seek help when it is
more than they can handle.
—Anne Pasco is chair of the Blended Learning
department at Huntley High School in Huntley, Illinois. Follow her on Twitter @apasco
158 or visit her school district’s website
at www.district158.org.
Here’s what other ISTE members
had to say about this topic.
Participate in our reader poll
at iste.org/LL.
Reallocate Resources to Digital Citizenship
Monitoring students’ social media posts
is an archaic and backward way to teach
digital citizenship. Positive reinforcement is essential to promoting successful students, and punishing ex-“post”
facto does not properly address the
(albeit serious) issue of cyberbully-ing. The time and exorbitant resources
poured into policing social media could
better be spent properly educating students in all areas of digital citizenship.
Erica Ellis
Concurrent student coordinator
Mesa, Arizona
In Loco Parentis
In loco parentis is a legal doctrine under
which school systems assume parental
rights, duties, and obligations. It has
shaped the rights and responsibilities of
schools and teachers for centuries. Just
as educators check for comprehension
and application of curricula, districts
should monitor the public posts of those
under their care for acceptable use.
Arlen Walker
Educational training coordinator
Idaho State University
Pocatello, Idaho
Who Is Liable?
Let’s say a student is considering suicide and writes this on Facebook. The
school misses it, and the student unfortunately commits suicide. The parent wants to know why the school did
not report what the child was posting,
as they were previously [told] that the
district would be monitoring cyber-activity. Therefore the parent felt safe
and did not monitor it themselves.
Rich Gaskill
Associate professor, Ashford University
Clinton, Iowa
Allow the Teachable Moments
Monitoring students’ social media posts
is by definition an after-the-fact action.
Better to spend time up front helping
students become mindful citizens and
humans so that online interactions can
be civil, playful, helpful, supportive, and
distinct. Mistakes will be made but, like
all mistakes, will offer opportunities for
engaged and wise teachers to help students reflect and learn.
Steve Taffee
Educational consultant
San Francisco, California
Better Sooner Than Too Late
After a child has committed suicide due
to bullying or has posted how s/he plans
to take a gun to school to wreak havoc,
engaging and reflecting are akin to grief
counseling for the survivors. I agree that
these are great tools to use, but intercepting a kid who plans to murder his
classmates needs to be discovered before
the event, not after the fact.
Larry Edmonds
Educator, editor, writer, speaker, trainer, and coach
Arizona State University
Phoenix, Arizona
Freedom of Speech
Social media posts are the modern-day
equivalent of conversation. If there was a
proposal to monitor all words that came
out of students’ mouths just in case there
was bullying or threats to student safety,
there would be a public outcry that this
violated freedom of speech. Social media needs to be included in the updated
interpretation of speech as defined by
our first amendment.
Stacey Guney
Executive director, Highlands Learning Center
Austin Community College
Austin, Texas
NO 51 YES 49%